tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12845739.post4340947840226422939..comments2023-11-03T15:48:35.688+00:00Comments on Paul Linford: It's not that I don't care, honest....Paul Linfordhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01977920120772282561noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12845739.post-43741975309347173082008-12-05T21:41:00.000+00:002008-12-05T21:41:00.000+00:00I think your hunch is probably more a case of indi...I think your hunch is probably more a case of indigestion - and understandable too. <BR/><BR/>I would be feeling a little sick in the stomach if I supported this anti-democratic lot of no-hopers presently infesting Parliament masquerading as the Labour Pary.<BR/><BR/>OT word verification bent u? - Not prophetic one trusts!Michelehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09117510718604467580noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12845739.post-25939853851404973112008-12-05T18:11:00.000+00:002008-12-05T18:11:00.000+00:00Fergus you're quite right.Robin Cook used his insi...Fergus you're quite right.<BR/>Robin Cook used his inside info to launch some of the most brilliantly forensic parliamentary performances seen in a generation.<BR/>Nobody would accuse Damian Green of doing that.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12845739.post-14762556055185064562008-12-05T16:07:00.000+00:002008-12-05T16:07:00.000+00:00So every leak was on an issue of national security...So every leak was on an issue of national security, was it Daily Pundit?<BR/><BR/>Were any of the leaks really related to national security? Certainly none that were put in the public domain.<BR/><BR/>Just what, precisely, have the Tories "been at"? Anything that Gordon Brown, Robin Cook, etc. weren't "at" when they were in opposition? I don't think so.<BR/><BR/>It's going to be difficult to Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12845739.post-17038966568000390082008-12-05T15:00:00.000+00:002008-12-05T15:00:00.000+00:00You'll be proved right, Paul. The Tories have been...You'll be proved right, Paul. The Tories have been at it and they've been rumbled. It's going to be difficult to take them seriously on issues of national security after this.The Daily Pundithttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10897210727324532431noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12845739.post-14071139144311657302008-12-05T09:53:00.000+00:002008-12-05T09:53:00.000+00:00Michael Martin received a large amount of egg on h...Michael Martin received a large amount of egg on his face this morning when it emerged that the police DID inform the Sergeant at Arms that they didn't have a warrant and explained the nature of their search - which Michael Martin denied earlier in the week.Letters From A Toryhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14612766550608940053noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12845739.post-42312516799786294102008-12-04T22:27:00.000+00:002008-12-04T22:27:00.000+00:00It's a poor man's Dreyfus case, with nine hours do...It's a poor man's Dreyfus case, with nine hours down the nick replacing four years on Devil's Island. There is even the parallel irony that Dreyfus was a reactionary defended by the left, while many of Damien Green's supporters will have regarded him as dangerously liberal up until last week. Richard Littlejohn has already cast himself in the Zola role (that's the novelist, not the West Ham Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12845739.post-13694080845586670712008-12-04T19:30:00.000+00:002008-12-04T19:30:00.000+00:00The 'whole story' is a simple one. The Sally Murre...The 'whole story' is a simple one. The Sally Murrer judgement meant the Green case had no prospect of a conviction from the moment the police set the wheels in motion.<BR/><BR/>We shouldn't be surprised at the police commencing proceedings the day after an identical case had collapsed. This was the Met, the self-same force that advised Thames Valley about the Murrer case, so it clearly had no MorrisOxhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11952846056079111473noreply@blogger.com