With less than 24 hours to go before the polls open, here are a few random thoughts on the election.
1. I wish it wasn't happening at all. Two months ago, Parliament had
Boris Johnson just where it wanted him but it allowed him to wriggle
free and call the election he wanted on the day he wanted while he was
still at the height of his Prime Ministerial honeymoon. If, as I expect,
he wins a majority tomorrow, the question future historians will ask is
why Jeremy Corbyn, Jo Swinson and Nicola Sturgeon agreed to the
election in the first place. The answer in the case of Sturgeon is
obvious - the SNP wants a Johnson majority government so it can continue
to fan the flames of Scottish separatism. It is less clear what Labour
and the Lib Dems thought they had to gain from holding an election when
the Tories were miles ahead in the opinion polls.
2. If there has been a gamechanger in this election, it was the decision by the Brexit Party not to field candidates in Tory-held seats, in return for the Tories giving a pledge to exit the transition period at the end of 2020 without a trade deal if necessary. This has certainly enhanced the prospects of a Tory victory even if the price for the Tory Party has been to have effectively become the Brexit Party. By contrast, the Remainers have not been nearly so hard-headed. Tactical voting may help maximise the anti-Brexit vote to some degree, but if they really wanted to stop Brexit, there should have been many more local pacts between pro-Remain parties - including Labour.
3. Far from "getting
Brexit done," Johnson's decision to rule out an extension to the
transition - and to make it an explicit manifesto pledge - is almost
certain to lead to another Brexit crisis in a year's time in which the
country is faced with the prospect of a no-deal exit from current
tariff-free trading arrangements with the EU. I do not see how the EU
can possibly agree to any sort of trade deal in that timecale unless it
is one in which the UK agrees to stay very closely aligned to EU rules
while no longer having a say over them - an outcome which, even if
Johnson were to agree to it, would be opposed by many of his MPs and
which would, of course, render Brexit completely pointless. Tony Blair
has been right all along - we can either have the painful Brexit, or the
pointless Brexit. There is no third way.
4. In these final
days, we are seeing why the Tories were so keen to hold an election this
side of Christmas - because there is going to be a winter health crisis
and it is going to get worse. If Johnson is re-elected, I confidently
predict that by the end of February he will be the most unpopular PM on
record and people will be genuinely wondering why they gave this clown
another five years in which to wreck our National Health Service.
5. At the risk of stating the bleeding obvious, the campaign has
demonstrated beyond any reasonable doubt that neither Johnson nor Corbyn
is fit to be Prime Minister. Johnson is a proven liar who has already
shown in the conduct of his personal relationships that he does not have
the right character to lead the country. He has no convictions other
than a belief in his own right to rule and when confronted by a genuine
crisis - the London Bridge stabbings - he sought to play the situation
for narrow political advantage rather than demonstrating national
leadership. This, coupled with his refusal to apologise for deeply
racist comments and articles made earlier in his political career, or to
submit to cross-examination by Andrew Neil, shows the true measure of
the man - more Alan Partridge than Winston Churchill.
6. By
contrast, I do not believe Jeremy Corbyn is a racist, but by his own
admission he has done far too little to tackle the scourge of
anti-semitism in his party. For me, this is less an indicator of racism,
and more an indicator of his inability to manage the party and the
people around him, some of whom, notably Seumas Milne and Len McCluskey,
are deeply unattractive individuals who appear to be engaged in some
sort of class war. The calibre of the Labour front bench is appallingly
low and gives people little confidence that it could form an effective
government. Only Angela Rayner, of the leading shadow cabinet
spokespeople, emerges from the campaign with any sort of credit.
7. Whatever you think about Johnson or Corbyn, the biggest
disappointment of the campaign has been Jo Swinson. After their strong
performance in last year's Euro-elections, the Lib Dems finally looked
to be back in the game, but after replacing Vince Cable as leader,
Swinson completely misjudged the public mood by shifting the party's
Brexit policy from second referendum to revoke and then spent the first
weeks of the campaign whingeing about not being allowed to take part in
TV debates alongside the two main party leaders. In retrospect it is
clear that Sir Ed Davey would have been a better leader. That said,
though, the Lib Dems appear to have assumed the mantle of the sensible
party when it comes to the economy, in contrast to the fantastical
spending promises of the Tories and Labour.
8. It follows from
all of the above that I believe another hung Parliament would be the
best outcome from tomorrow. It would leave Johnson fatally wounded while
Corbyn will have failed twice to win an election outright against Tory
opponents who between them have come close to wrecking the country.
Whichever of them ended up as Prime Minister would have little room for
manoeuvre in terms of their more outlandish policies and would probably
have no option but to call a second referendum on Brexit ahead of a
fresh election. It might sound less than ideal, and it is, but better
that than either of the nightmarish alternatives.
No comments:
Post a Comment