The next election contest, said Tony Blair yesterday, will be "a flyweight versus a heavyweight." He said of David Cameron: "However much he dances around the ring beforehand he will come in reach of a big clunking fist and, you know what, he'll be out on his feet, carried out of the ring."
He's right about Cameron, of course. The public will find him out before long and the Tories will discover that they have massively overestimated the impact that Blair's departure will have on their electoral prospects.
But did Blair's comments constitute the long-awaited endorsement of Gordon Brown, as seems to be the
consensus this morning, or could it be, as
The Sun suggests, that John Reid could still be the one to send the Boy David crashing to the canvas?
After all, as the commentator Peter Dobbie wrote a few years' back, the Home Secretary does have
something of a reputation as a pugilist in Westminster circles.
What does seem to be clear is that Blair has endorsed Brown or Reid, as opposed to any other candidate - which is exactly how it should be. The two of them are head and shoulders above any other candidates when it comes to experience, gravitas, and the ability to command an audience, and if there is to be a contest, then those should be the two names on the ballot paper.
In other words, it's surely now time for Hutton, Milburn, Johnson and all the other John Major-alikes to crawl back under their stones and let the real men fight it out.
An occasional series dedicated to bringing the choicest comments from the blogosphere to a slightly wider audience. 
